U.S. appeals court rejects Biden’s bid to revive student debt plan


Nov 30 (Reuters) – A federal appeals court on Wednesday refused to stay the ruling of a Texas judge who said President Joe Biden’s plan to cancel hundreds of billions of dollars in student loans was illegal.

The New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the Biden administration’s request to suspend a judge’s Nov. 10 order to lift the $400 billion student debt forgiveness program in a lawsuit brought by a conservative advocacy group.

The decision by Fort Worth, Texas-based U.S. District Judge Mark Pittman was one of two national decisions that have prevented the U.S. Department of Education under the Democratic president from making progress in providing debt relief to millions of borrowers.

The administration has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to similarly revoke an order from the St. Louis-based 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that, at the request of six Republican-led states, had banned it from withdrawing student loans.

A three-judge panel from the 5th Circuit declined in Wednesday’s brief order to put Pittman’s ruling on hold while the administration appealed its decision, but the court ordered the appeal be expedited.

The panel consisted of two Republican appointees and a judge nominated by then Democratic President Barack Obama. Pittman was appointed by then Republican President Donald Trump.

The White House had no direct comment, but the administration has said that if the 5th Circuit refuses to overturn Pittman’s order, it will ask the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene.

Biden announced in August that the US government would forgive up to $10,000 in student loans for borrowers earning less than $125,000 a year, or $250,000 for married couples. Students who received Pell Grants benefiting lower-income students will have up to $20,000 of their debt forgiven.

During the 2020 presidential campaign, Biden pledged to help former students in debt. Biden’s program has drawn opposition from Republicans, who have portrayed it as shifting debt from wealthy elites to lower-income Americans.

The Congressional Budget Office calculated in September that the debt cancellation program would cost taxpayers about $400 billion.

About 26 million Americans have applied for student loan forgiveness, and the U.S. Department of Education had already approved 16 million requests by the time Pittman made his ruling.

Biden announced last week that his administration would put a pause on student loan payments to ease uncertainty for borrowers as the lawsuit over the debt relief plan plays out.

Pittman had ruled in a lawsuit brought by two borrowers who were partially or completely ineligible for loan forgiveness and who were backed by the Job Creators Network Foundation, a conservative advocacy group founded by Bernie Marcus, a Home Depot co-founder.

The judge said it was irrelevant whether Biden’s plan was good public policy because the program was “one of the largest exercises of legislative power without congressional authority in the history of the United States.”

Pittman wrote that the HEROES Act — a loan aid bill for military personnel that the Biden administration relied on to implement the contingency plan — did not authorize the program.

Elaine Parker, president of the Job Creators Network Foundation, said in a statement Wednesday that the 5th Circuit’s injunction prevented the administration from attempting to “get money out the door for debtors and claim victory” during the appeal.

Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston; Edited by Tom Hogue, Robert Birsel

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Principles of Trust.

Nathan Raymond

Thomson Reuters

Nate Raymond reports on federal judiciary and litigation. He can be reached at [email protected]

The Valley Voice
The Valley Voicehttp://thevalleyvoice.org
Christopher Brito is a social media producer and trending writer for The Valley Voice, with a focus on sports and stories related to race and culture.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share post:


More like this